Metafiction is 'frame structure' in Korean
-story within a story!
At
first, when some strange guy named Chico appeared abruptly in bold letters, I
could not understand why. Why does he pop up all of sudden? What does this
story mean? I even asked the friends about the meaning of the story because it was
frustrating to not know the purpose of what I’m reading. They merely told me to
keep on and I would know the answer, but I simply did not want to keep on
reading! I decided I will read it some other time, and that state went on for
quite a period of time. I admit, I’m a little bit picky in reading.
The next minute, I realized
I would get in trouble if I put the reading off any longer. I opened the book
reluctantly. It was still hard to focus, but as I continued on, I got the
point. It was a kind of reflective story of Gordon- the narrator. It was
exciting to see the pages left of the story decreasing, too. Then I finished
it. It was when I read the part about Gordon dismissing the essay to a typical
product of an undergraduate creative writing workshop. So it was the story Gordon
wrote! It is even mentioned that Gordon did not show this story to his parents
unlike everything else since it contains too much of his dead brother Dennis
and ‘most of all, too much 1960s.’ The story, as a whole, was straight from own
experiences.
Surprisingly, it
was pretty much interesting when I thought it over. What is his ultimate
purpose of putting that story in, also keeping in mind that Gordon- and furthermore, Chico-
is very similar to Stephen King himself in many ways? We used this tactic
called metafiction- the method of literature which the narrator tells the
authors that the story is fake- in class as well. Firstly, I wanted to know bit
more about metafiction, not just the definition, so I looked it up on the
internet. It said: ‘the metafiction novel gains
significance beyond its fictional realms by outwardly projecting its inner
self-reflective tendencies.’ Simply put, it becomes real
by not pretending to be real. In the story ‘Stud City’, it becomes more
reflective of the writer-in-book Gordon by stating that it is only a fiction. I
don’t think I completely understand what his intends were, though; I guess I
will read it again, this time more carefully and enjoyably.
Good analysis, and I'm glad you didn't dismiss the book right away. I had the same impression at first. I was a bit angry at Stephen King for stopping the real story and making me read his contrived, 'hackneyed' melodrama written during university. But then, you like you say, it becomes clear. In terms of themes (writing, family, death, friendship) there's a lot buried in there.
ReplyDeleteGood post!